CYO v Children’s Guardian [2019] NSWCATAD 55
The Tribunal held that the applicant rebutted the statutory presumption that he posed a risk to the safety of children. Although the offences were serious, involved a vulnerable 15-year-old student and a teacher in authority, and there remained lingering doubt or suspicion about additional alleged misconduct, substantial weight was given to the passage of approximately 27 to 30 years, the absence of similar further criminal conduct, the applicant's remorse and insight, his support from family and community, and the expert evidence of Dr Collins that he was a low risk of reoffending. The Tribunal was also satisfied that a reasonable person would allow unsupervised contact with the...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Enabling Order and Working With Children Check Clearance Under the Child Protection (working With Children) Act 2012 (nsw) / Decision After Hearing; Applicant's Costs Application Determined
- Outcome
- Application for enabling order granted; Working With Children Check clearance ordered; costs application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['application for Enabling Order' 'disqualified Person' 'risk to the Safety of Children' 'statutory Presumption of Risk' 'indecent Assault of Child by Person in Authority' 'professional Boundaries' 'public Interest' 'costs in Tribunal Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Enabling Order and Working With Children Check Clearance Under the Child Protection (working With Children) Act 2012 (nsw) / Decision After Hearing; Applicant's Costs Application Determined
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant proved, on the balance of probabilities, that he does not pose a risk to the safety of children despite the statutory presumption in s 28(7) of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 (NSW).' "Whether the Tribunal should declare that the applicant is not to be treated as a disqualified person and order the Children's Guardian to grant a Working With Children Check clearance." 'Whether a reasonable person would allow his or her child to have direct unsupervised contact with the applicant while engaged in child-related work and whether making the order was in the public interest.' 'Whether the Tribunal could or should award the applicant costs thrown away by reason of an adjournment following late filing of the AISNSW investigation report.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal held that the applicant rebutted the statutory presumption that he posed a risk to the safety of children. Although the offences were serious, involved a vulnerable 15-year-old student and a teacher in authority, and there remained lingering doubt or suspicion about additional alleged misconduct, substantial weight was given to the passage of approximately 27 to 30 years, the absence of similar further criminal conduct, the applicant's remorse and insight, his support from family and community, and the expert evidence of Dr Collins that he was a low risk of reoffending. The Tribunal was also satisfied that a reasonable person would allow unsupervised contact with the...
Court Disposition
Application for enabling order granted; Working With Children Check clearance ordered; costs application dismissed.
Orders
- ['Declare that the applicant is not to be treated as a disqualified person for the purposes of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 (NSW) in respect of the offence of assault with an act of indecency (2 counts), Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 61E.' 'Pursuant to s 28 (6) of the Child Protection (Working...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment