CZAL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 89

The application to extend time was refused because the original judicial review application was out of time, prior litigation failed to establish jurisdictional error, and no prospect of success was shown for any appeal.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 13 February 2006
Procedural Posture: Application to Extend Time to Seek Leave to Appeal / Decision on Application to Extend Time Within Which to Seek Leave to Appeal
Outcome: Application to extend time dismissed
Legal Topics: ['extension of Time' 'judicial Review' 'protection Visa' 'privative Clause Decision']

['migration Law'] ['extension of Time' 'judicial Review' 'protection Visa' 'privative Clause Decision']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Application to Extend Time to Seek Leave to Appeal / Decision on Application to Extend Time Within Which to Seek Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether the application to extend time to seek leave to appeal should be granted' 'Whether the original tribunal decision was attended by jurisdictional error']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application to extend time dismissed

Orders

['The application to extend time within which to seek leave to appeal be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs." 'The first respondent serve on the applicant at his address for service the reasons for judgment and the orders.' 'The Refugee Review Tribunal be joined as a respondent.']