CZJ v Commissioner of Victims Rights [2017] NSWCATAD 259
On the balance of probabilities, the Tribunal was not satisfied that CZJ was the primary victim of an act of violence. There was no contemporaneous report or evidence supporting sexual assault as defined, nor evidence of injury resulting from an act of violence, and available medical evidence did not relate to the alleged assault.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Application dismissed, decision of Assessor affirmed
- Legal Topics
- ['recognition Payment' 'act of Violence' 'sexual Assault' 'eligibility for Support']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant was a primary victim of an act of violence under the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013' 'Whether an act of violence was established on the balance of probabilities' 'Whether the applicant suffered injury as a result of an act of violence']
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities, the Tribunal was not satisfied that CZJ was the primary victim of an act of violence. There was no contemporaneous report or evidence supporting sexual assault as defined, nor evidence of injury resulting from an act of violence, and available medical evidence did not relate to the alleged assault.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed, decision of Assessor affirmed
Orders
- ['Pursuant to s 63(3)(a) of the ADR Act, the decision of the Assessor dated 8 October 2015 is affirmed.' 'A non-publication Order is made under s 64(1) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (No. 2) in respect of names of private individuals and other identifying information.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment