CZQL v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1610
The application for extension of time was dismissed because the three and a half year delay was extreme and inadequately explained; the applicant’s circumstances, including incarceration and lack of legal advice, were not exceptional or persuasive enough to justify an extension given this length of delay, and the merits of the proposed judicial review were at best arguable, not strong or exceptional as required for such a lengthy late application.
- Parties
- Applicant: CZQL; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (now Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs); Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time for Judicial Review (migration) / Disposition of Application for Extension of Time in Federal Court
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time dismissed; costs awarded against applicant.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time for Judicial Review, Visa Cancellation Under S 501 Ca(4) of the Migration Act, Tribunal Review and Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CZQL
Applicant
Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (now Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs)
First Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time for Judicial Review (migration) / Disposition of Application for Extension of Time in Federal Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an extension of time to seek judicial review of a Tribunal decision not to revoke visa cancellation should be granted under s 477A of the Migration Act
- 2 Whether the applicant gave a satisfactory explanation for the lengthy delay
- 3 Whether the proposed judicial review grounds have merit
Ratio Decidendi
The application for extension of time was dismissed because the three and a half year delay was extreme and inadequately explained; the applicant’s circumstances, including incarceration and lack of legal advice, were not exceptional or persuasive enough to justify an extension given this length of delay, and the merits of the proposed judicial review were at best arguable, not strong or exceptional as required for such a lengthy late application.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time dismissed; costs awarded against applicant.
Orders
- The name of the first respondent be changed to Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs.
- The application for extension of time filed on 19 July 2021 be dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment