CZY16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1171
The Tribunal made findings regarding the threat of harm from Tarun Dal or other groups in connection with demands for money due to the appellant’s wealth. It concluded such demands did not constitute serious harm under the Migration Act 1958. Accordingly, there was no error, and the new ground lacked merit, so leave was refused and the appeal dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Raise New Ground on Appeal and the Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed. Leave to raise new ground of appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'protection Visa' 'federal Appeal Procedure' 'new Grounds of Appeal' 'serious Harm Under Migration Act 1958']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Raise New Ground on Appeal and the Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to raise a new ground of appeal not raised at first instance' 'Whether the Tribunal made a finding on the appellant’s claim that he feared harm in Nepal from Tarun Dal due to demands for money because of his wealth']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal made findings regarding the threat of harm from Tarun Dal or other groups in connection with demands for money due to the appellant’s wealth. It concluded such demands did not constitute serious harm under the Migration Act 1958. Accordingly, there was no error, and the new ground lacked merit, so leave was refused and the appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed. Leave to raise new ground of appeal refused.
Orders
- ['The appellant is refused leave to raise his new ground of appeal.' 'The appeal is dismissed, with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment