Environment Protection Authority v D F Herbert Pty Limited [2006] NSWLEC 575
The defendant company breached a critical licence condition by accommodating in excess of the prescribed cattle limit in its feedlot, constituting a continuing offence under s 64 and s 241 of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997. The breach was serious and wilful, aggravating culpability, and warranted a penalty calculated with regard to the period and degree of excedence, mitigated by cooperation, early guilty plea, and rectification of the offence.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Environment Protection Authority; Defendant: D F Herbert Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 August 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Prosecution / Judgment
- Outcome
- conviction and sentence
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Pollution Licence, Feedlot Operation, Penalty Calculation, Odour Emission
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Environment Protection Authority
Prosecutor
D F Herbert Pty Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Prosecution / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether D F Herbert Pty Limited breached conditions of its pollution licence by accommodating more than 4000 cattle in its feedlot.
- 2 Whether the offence constituted a continuing offence and the appropriate penalty calculation.
- 3 Assessment of harm, mitigation, and culpability.
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant company breached a critical licence condition by accommodating in excess of the prescribed cattle limit in its feedlot, constituting a continuing offence under s 64 and s 241 of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997. The breach was serious and wilful, aggravating culpability, and warranted a penalty calculated with regard to the period and degree of excedence, mitigated by cooperation, early guilty plea, and rectification of the offence.
Court Disposition
conviction and sentence
Orders
- Conviction of D F Herbert Pty Limited for breach of the pollution licence.
- Imposition of penalty of $80,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment