Rouse v Palerang Council [2011] NSWLEC 1029
The 2 September 2010 comment did not identify Mr Rouse with the merits of his clients' cause and could not found or contribute to rejecting him as a witness. Although later comments were made, Mr Rouse's explanations, his evidence that his opinions were his own and prepared for the assistance of the Court, and the absence of any fiscal contingency arrangement or other economic interest meant that he should be permitted to give evidence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Proceedings / Voir Dire Procedural Ruling on Whether Mr Rouse Should Be Permitted to Give Evidence
- Outcome
- Evidence admitted
- Legal Topics
- ['voir Dire' 'bias' 'expert Evidence' 'expert Witness Code of Conduct']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Proceedings / Voir Dire Procedural Ruling on Whether Mr Rouse Should Be Permitted to Give Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Mr Rouse, a town planner retained by the owners and the nominal applicant, should be permitted to give evidence.' 'Whether comments made by Mr Rouse showed actual bias contrary to the Expert Witness Code of Conduct.']
Ratio Decidendi
The 2 September 2010 comment did not identify Mr Rouse with the merits of his clients' cause and could not found or contribute to rejecting him as a witness. Although later comments were made, Mr Rouse's explanations, his evidence that his opinions were his own and prepared for the assistance of the Court, and the absence of any fiscal contingency arrangement or other economic interest meant that he should be permitted to give evidence.
Court Disposition
Evidence admitted
Orders
- ['Mr Rouse was permitted to give evidence on behalf of the applicants in the proceedings.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment