D - Studio Architects Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council (No 2) [2011] NSWLEC 1134
The amended development proposal provides reduced density, improved amenity, sufficient setbacks and landscaping, and reasonably complies with the prevailing planning controls, justifying consent under PLEP 2001.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed, development consent granted
- Legal Topics
- ['multi Unit Housing' 'compatibility With Neighbourhood' 'draft LEP Weight' 'internal Amenity' 'solar Access' 'communal Space' 'landscaping']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['compatibility of proposal with surrounding residential character and zoning' 'internal building separation compliance' 'solar access provision' 'community safety through design']
Ratio Decidendi
The amended development proposal provides reduced density, improved amenity, sufficient setbacks and landscaping, and reasonably complies with the prevailing planning controls, justifying consent under PLEP 2001.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed, development consent granted
Orders
- ['The appeal is allowed.' 'Development consent is granted for the erection of a 19 multi unit development at 25 and 27 Dixmude Street, South Granville subject to the conditions in Annexure A.' 'The exhibits may be returned except 1, 15, 16, Z, DD and EE.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment