D-Studio Architects Pty Ltd v Waverley Council [2023] NSWLEC 1278
Because the parties reached agreement, the amended modification application had owner consent, remained substantially the same as the parent consent, had been notified with no submissions received, satisfied the relevant environmental planning instruments and raised no unacceptable environmental impacts, the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 8.9 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Concerning a Modification Application / Orders Made After S 34 Conciliation Conference and Final Agreement Filed
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Development Consent DA-325/2021/A modified in accordance with the agreed terms.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification Application' 'residential Apartment Development' 'conciliation Agreement' 'jurisdictional Prerequisites' 'height of Buildings Development Standard']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 8.9 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Concerning a Modification Application / Orders Made After S 34 Conciliation Conference and Final Agreement Filed
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court should dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether the amended modification application could be approved under s 4.55(8) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.' 'Whether the amended modification application remained substantially the same as the parent development consent.' 'Whether relevant environmental planning instruments and notification requirements were satisfied.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached agreement, the amended modification application had owner consent, remained substantially the same as the parent consent, had been notified with no submissions received, satisfied the relevant environmental planning instruments and raised no unacceptable environmental impacts, the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Development Consent DA-325/2021/A modified in accordance with the agreed terms.
Orders
- ['Leave is granted to the Applicant to amend DA-325/2021/A and rely on the amended plans and documents listed at condition 1 of Annexure A.' 'The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Consent DA-325/2021/A is modified in the terms set out at Annexure A.' 'Development Consent DA-325/2021/A as modified by the Court is set...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment