D v C [1998] NSWCA 67
On the facts found by the trial judge, including assessments of credibility, the inference that the appellant knew of the risk and failed to act was properly drawn. The duty of care was conceded on appeal, and the appellate court found no error in the trial judge's reasoning or application of legal principles. The appeal failed on all grounds.
- Parties
- Appellant: D; Respondent: C
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Duty of Care, Liability of Social Host, Foreseeability of Harm, Causation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D
Appellant
C
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant, as a social host, was liable in negligence for failing to prevent a sexual assault by a third party guest
- 2 Whether a duty of care was owed in the circumstances
- 3 Whether the trial judge's inference of the appellant's knowledge was open on the evidence
Ratio Decidendi
On the facts found by the trial judge, including assessments of credibility, the inference that the appellant knew of the risk and failed to act was properly drawn. The duty of care was conceded on appeal, and the appellate court found no error in the trial judge's reasoning or application of legal principles. The appeal failed on all grounds.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment