Daintree Cafe Pty Ltd v Jacfun Pty Ltd [2002] NSWADT 188
The material before the Tribunal did not sufficiently particularise or prove beyond reasonable doubt any grave or weighty contempt, and the Tribunal, exercising its discretion under s131 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act, declined to refer the matter to the Supreme Court.
- Parties
- Applicant: Daintree Cafe Pty Limited; Respondent: Jacfun Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt Application / Principal Matter; Post Hearing Decision
- Outcome
- Reference dismissed; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Tribunal, Implied Undertaking Regarding Documents, Referral Procedures Under S131 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daintree Cafe Pty Limited
Applicant
Jacfun Pty Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Contempt Application / Principal Matter; Post Hearing Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicant committed contempt by allowing Tribunal documents to be used for a collateral purpose
- 2 Whether the Tribunal should refer the matter to the Supreme Court under s131 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act
Ratio Decidendi
The material before the Tribunal did not sufficiently particularise or prove beyond reasonable doubt any grave or weighty contempt, and the Tribunal, exercising its discretion under s131 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act, declined to refer the matter to the Supreme Court.
Court Disposition
Reference dismissed; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The reference Notice to Show Cause is dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment