Scott v Bodley (No 2) [2022] NSWDC 651
The plaintiff failed to establish that the allegedly defamatory reviews were read or accessed by any third party, failed to provide a platform of facts or causation, and did not demonstrate serious harm to reputation as required by s 10A of the Defamation Act 2005 (NSW); the proceedings must therefore be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Determination of Serious Harm (pre Trial, Preliminary Issue)
- Outcome
- proceedings dismissed for failure to establish serious harm (threshold issue)
- Legal Topics
- ['defamation' 'serious Harm' 'online Reviews' 'threshold Requirements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Determination of Serious Harm (pre Trial, Preliminary Issue)
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the plaintiff has established 'serious harm' to reputation as required by s 10A of the Defamation Act 2005 (NSW)" 'Whether online publication was read or accessed' 'Whether negative online reviews can constitute serious harm for a small business']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff failed to establish that the allegedly defamatory reviews were read or accessed by any third party, failed to provide a platform of facts or causation, and did not demonstrate serious harm to reputation as required by s 10A of the Defamation Act 2005 (NSW); the proceedings must therefore be dismissed.
Court Disposition
proceedings dismissed for failure to establish serious harm (threshold issue)
Orders
- ['Pursuant to Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 28.2, the plaintiff has failed to establish serious harm to reputation as required under s 10A of the Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) and the proceedings are dismissed.' "The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings, with liberty to apply."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment