Dalelaw Pty Ltd v Burwood Council [2020] NSWLEC 1330
The Court upheld the appeal and approved the amended development application because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions, including because owner consent existed, the boarding houses were permissible in the R2 Low Density Residential zone, the proposal complied with relevant development standards and SEPP ARH requirements, contamination and BASIX requirements had been addressed, submissions had been considered, and no jurisdictional impediment was identified.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Application Appeal Against Deemed Refusal / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Development Application DA-2018/117 approved subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'deemed Refusal' 'boarding House Development' 're Subdivision' 'conciliation Conference' 'amended Plans' 'development Consent Conditions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Application Appeal Against Deemed Refusal / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court could make orders giving effect to the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979" 'Whether Development Application DA-2018/117, as amended, could be approved subject to conditions' 'Whether the proposed boarding house development was permissible and compliant with applicable planning controls']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court upheld the appeal and approved the amended development application because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions, including because owner consent existed, the boarding houses were permissible in the R2 Low Density Residential zone, the proposal complied with relevant development standards and SEPP ARH requirements, contamination and BASIX requirements had been addressed, submissions had been considered, and no jurisdictional impediment was identified.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Development Application DA-2018/117 approved subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The Applicant is granted leave to rely upon the amended plans and documentation referred to in Condition 1 to the conditions at Annexure A.' 'The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Application DA-2018/117 for the re-subdivision of the existing four lot into two lots and the construction of a boarding house on each...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment