Petronaitis v Rowles [2011] NSWCA 426

Petronaitis v Rowles [2011] NSWCA 426

The stay application failed because the property had already been sold and no basis was established for halting settlement: the sale was entered into by the person charged with financial management of the fifth respondent's affairs pursuant to appropriate authority. The applications concerning removal and replacement of the fifth respondent's tutor or solicitor were not appropriate for determination on the motion and should be dealt with in the Equity Division. The applicant's means, inability to obtain legal aid or private representation, and the utility of advice on prospects justified referral for pro bono legal assistance limited to advice on the proceedings.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 December 2011
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion in Court of Appeal Proceedings Concerning Leave to Appeal From Guardianship Related Decisions and Consequential Orders / Hearing of Applicant's Notice of Motion Seeking a Stay, Removal of Tutor/solicitor, Pro Bono Referral and Replacement Representation; and Directions on Respondents' Notice of Motion
Outcome
Order 1 of the applicant's notice of motion was dismissed; orders 3 and 5 were referred to the Equity Division; the applicant was referred for pro bono legal assistance; costs were awarded against the applicant on the notice of motion in favour of the second, third and fifth respondents; directions were made on the...
Legal Topics
['stay of Enforcement' "sale of Protected Person's Property" 'removal of Tutor or Solicitor' 'pro Bono Legal Assistance' 'guardianship and Financial Management Orders']
['civil Procedure' 'guardianship' 'appeals' 'equity'] ['stay of Enforcement' "sale of Protected Person's Property" 'removal of Tutor or Solicitor' 'pro Bono Legal Assistance' 'guardianship and Financial Management Orders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion in Court of Appeal Proceedings Concerning Leave to Appeal From Guardianship Related Decisions and Consequential Orders / Hearing of Applicant's Notice of Motion Seeking a Stay, Removal of Tutor/solicitor, Pro Bono Referral and Replacement Representation; and Directions on Respondents' Notice of Motion

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Court should stay the lifting of the injunction restraining sale of the Bronte property or halt or withdraw the consequent sale.' 'Whether the application to remove Michael McHugh as tutor and solicitor and D Roberts as counsel could appropriately be dealt with on the notice of motion before the Court.' 'Whether the applicant should be referred to the Registrar for pro bono legal assistance.' "How to deal with the second and third respondents' notice of motion filed in court seeking to strike out the summons for leave to appeal."]

Ratio Decidendi

The stay application failed because the property had already been sold and no basis was established for halting settlement: the sale was entered into by the person charged with financial management of the fifth respondent's affairs pursuant to appropriate authority. The applications concerning removal and replacement of the fifth respondent's tutor or solicitor were not appropriate for determination on the motion and should be dealt with in the Equity Division. The applicant's means, inability to obtain legal aid or private representation, and the utility of advice on prospects justified referral for pro bono legal assistance limited to advice on the proceedings.

Court Disposition

Order 1 of the applicant's notice of motion was dismissed; orders 3 and 5 were referred to the Equity Division; the applicant was referred for pro bono legal assistance; costs were awarded against the applicant on the notice of motion in favour of the second, third and fifth respondents; directions were made on the...

Orders

  • ['Dismiss order 1 of the notice of motion filed on 15 December 2011.' 'Refer the notice of motion insofar as it seeks orders 3 and 5 to the Equity Division to be listed on 3 February 2012 before the Registrar in conjunction with summons 2011/381012.' 'Refer the applicant to the Registrar for pro bono legal...