Franklins Limited v Burns; Burns v Franklins Limited [2005] NSWCA 54
The District Court's jurisdictional limit of $750,000 applied to the plaintiff's claim as proceedings commenced before the relevant amendments, and the awards for domestic assistance and non-economic loss were not manifestly excessive; recalculation for future domestic assistance required, but overall recovery cannot exceed the jurisdictional limit.
- Parties
- Defendant/appellant/respondent: Franklins Limited; Plaintiff/appellant/respondent: Kym Burns
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Claim / Appeal From District Court Decision
- Outcome
- Defendant's appeal dismissed with costs; plaintiff's appeal allowed in part (as to grounds 4 and 5), otherwise dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Damages, Non Economic Loss, Future Economic Loss, Domestic Assistance, Jurisdictional Limit
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Franklins Limited
Defendant/appellant/respondent
Kym Burns
Plaintiff/appellant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Claim / Appeal From District Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the District Court's jurisdictional limit applied to plaintiff's damages claim
- 2 Appropriate assessment of non-economic loss
- 3 Entitlement and calculation of damages for past and future domestic assistance
Ratio Decidendi
The District Court's jurisdictional limit of $750,000 applied to the plaintiff's claim as proceedings commenced before the relevant amendments, and the awards for domestic assistance and non-economic loss were not manifestly excessive; recalculation for future domestic assistance required, but overall recovery cannot exceed the jurisdictional limit.
Court Disposition
Defendant's appeal dismissed with costs; plaintiff's appeal allowed in part (as to grounds 4 and 5), otherwise dismissed.
Orders
- Defendant's appeal dismissed with costs.
- Plaintiff's appeal allowed as to grounds 4 and 5, but otherwise dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment