Facenfield v R [2021] NSWCCA 128
The sentencing judge's failure to apply a utilitarian discount for the applicant's early guilty plea for the goods in custody offence was contrary to principle, as the utilitarian value of a plea must be recognised regardless of the inevitable outcome. This error had the capacity to affect the aggregate sentence,...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Damien Facenfield; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Sentence Imposed by Drug Court of NSW
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentence quashed; applicant resentenced.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Against Sentence, Discount for Guilty Plea, Sentencing Discretion, Drug Offences, Property Offences, Aggregate Sentence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Damien Facenfield
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Sentence Imposed by Drug Court of NSW
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sentencing judge erred by failing to apply discount for early plea of guilty to goods in custody offence (Seq 8)
- 2 Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge's failure to apply a utilitarian discount for the applicant's early guilty plea for the goods in custody offence was contrary to principle, as the utilitarian value of a plea must be recognised regardless of the inevitable outcome. This error had the capacity to affect the aggregate sentence, justifying appellate intervention and resentencing.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentence quashed; applicant resentenced.
Orders
- Leave to appeal is granted.
- The appeal is allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment