George v R [2013] NSWCCA 263
The application for extension of time was dismissed because the delay was substantial, finality weighed against extension, the sentencing judge did not commit Muldrock error when the remarks were read as a whole, and in any event no lesser sentence was warranted in law given the objective seriousness of the offence and the applicant's subjective circumstances.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Extension of Time for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time by the applicant dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['causing Grievous Bodily Harm With Intent to Murder' 'standard Non Parole Period' 'muldrock Error' 'extension of Time' 'finality' 'criminal Appeal Act 1912 (nsw) S6(3)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Extension of Time for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time for leave to appeal against sentence.' 'Whether the sentencing judge erred in approaching the standard non-parole period legislation in light of Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120.' 'Whether any lesser sentence was warranted in law under s6(3) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW).']
Ratio Decidendi
The application for extension of time was dismissed because the delay was substantial, finality weighed against extension, the sentencing judge did not commit Muldrock error when the remarks were read as a whole, and in any event no lesser sentence was warranted in law given the objective seriousness of the offence and the applicant's subjective circumstances.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time by the applicant dismissed.
Orders
- ['The application for extension of time by the applicant be dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment