Miljus v CSR Ltd (No. 4) [2010] NSWSC 1325

Miljus v CSR Ltd (No. 4) [2010] NSWSC 1325

The builder defendant did not owe a duty of care to the Plaintiff in respect of the condition or safety of the public roadway used for concrete delivery; absence of legal control over the roadway and lack of Plaintiff reliance on any self-imposed duties meant no actionable duty existed. Even if duty were found, liability would not attach in circumstances where Plaintiff was not negligent, but the verdict remains for the Defendant.

Parties
Plaintiff: Damien Miljus; Second Defendant: Watpow Construction Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 December 2010
Procedural Posture
Tort Negligence Claim / Principal Judgment
Outcome
Verdict for the Defendant.
Legal Topics
Duty of Care, Builder Liability, Independent Contractor, Workplace Safety, Breach of Duty, Causation
Torts Negligence Duty of Care Builder Liability Independent Contractor Workplace Safety Breach of Duty Causation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 29 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Damien Miljus

Plaintiff

Watpow Construction Pty Ltd

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Tort Negligence Claim / Principal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the builder owed a duty of care to the Plaintiff with respect to the public roadway used for delivery
  2. 2 Whether any duty was breached
  3. 3 Causation between breach and injury

Ratio Decidendi

The builder defendant did not owe a duty of care to the Plaintiff in respect of the condition or safety of the public roadway used for concrete delivery; absence of legal control over the roadway and lack of Plaintiff reliance on any self-imposed duties meant no actionable duty existed. Even if duty were found, liability would not attach in circumstances where Plaintiff was not negligent, but the verdict remains for the Defendant.

Court Disposition

Verdict for the Defendant.

Orders

  • Plaintiff to pay the Defendant's costs.