Naidu, Damodara v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs & Anor [1997] FCA 1225

Naidu, Damodara v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs & Anor [1997] FCA 1225

No error of law was disclosed in the Tribunal's reasoning. The matters raised by the applicant were purely questions of fact, and the Tribunal gave a full and clear explanation for concluding that the cl 812.723(6) criterion was not satisfied.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 October 1997
Procedural Posture
Migration Judicial Review / Application for Judicial Review of a Decision of the Immigration Review Tribunal Confirming Refusal of a Class 812 Entry Permit
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['class 812 Entry Permit' 'compassionate Grounds' 'extreme Hardship or Irreparable Prejudice' 'error of Law' 'judicial Review']
['migration' 'administrative Law'] ['class 812 Entry Permit' 'compassionate Grounds' 'extreme Hardship or Irreparable Prejudice' 'error of Law' 'judicial Review']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration Judicial Review / Application for Judicial Review of a Decision of the Immigration Review Tribunal Confirming Refusal of a Class 812 Entry Permit

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Immigration Review Tribunal made an error of law in finding that the applicant did not satisfy cl 812.723(6) of the Migration (1993) Regulations.' 'Whether refusal of the entry permit would have caused extreme hardship or irreparable prejudice to an Australian citizen or Australian permanent resident on 15 October 1990 and whether that compassionate ground continued to exist.']

Ratio Decidendi

No error of law was disclosed in the Tribunal's reasoning. The matters raised by the applicant were purely questions of fact, and the Tribunal gave a full and clear explanation for concluding that the cl 812.723(6) criterion was not satisfied.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Application dismissed with costs.']