Arnesen v Commissioner, NSW Department of Corrective Services [2008] NSWADT 294
Consideration of Mr Arnesen's application to vary his inmate classification was a service provided by the Commissioner within the meaning of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977. However, the evidence did not establish that requiring him to prove Australian citizenship was less favourable treatment on the ground of his Canadian national origin. The policy referred to citizenship status rather than place of birth, susceptibility to removal or deportation was not proved to be a relevant characteristic, and there was insufficient evidence that an inmate born in Australia would have been treated differently. The complaint therefore failed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Race Discrimination Complaint Concerning Provision of Services Under the Anti Discrimination Act 1977 / Final Decision After Hearing
- Outcome
- Complaint dismissed; no order for costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['race Discrimination' 'national Origin' 'provision of Services' 'prisoner Classification' 'comparator Evidence' 'citizenship Status']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Race Discrimination Complaint Concerning Provision of Services Under the Anti Discrimination Act 1977 / Final Decision After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether consideration of an inmate's application to vary correctional classification was a service within the meaning of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977." 'Whether requiring Mr Arnesen to establish Australian citizenship before varying his classification was less favourable treatment on the ground of national origin.' 'Whether susceptibility to removal or deportation under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) was a characteristic appertaining generally to, or generally imputed to, persons born in Canada or persons born outside Australia.' 'Whether the evidence showed that an inmate born in Australia would have been treated differently in the same circumstances.']
Ratio Decidendi
Consideration of Mr Arnesen's application to vary his inmate classification was a service provided by the Commissioner within the meaning of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977. However, the evidence did not establish that requiring him to prove Australian citizenship was less favourable treatment on the ground of his Canadian national origin. The policy referred to citizenship status rather than place of birth, susceptibility to removal or deportation was not proved to be a relevant characteristic, and there was insufficient evidence that an inmate born in Australia would have been treated differently. The complaint therefore failed.
Court Disposition
Complaint dismissed; no order for costs.
Orders
- ['The complaint is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment