Weller v Anderson [2021] FCA 503
The applicant failed to discharge the onus of proof for his allegations of sexual harassment and discrimination, as there was insufficient corroboration, no oral evidence or cross-examination, and no inherent implausibility or inconsistency established in the respondent's denial; thus, the claim could not be sustained.
- Parties
- Applicant: Damon Weller; Respondent: Michael Anthony Anderson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Application Human Rights/sex Discrimination / Judgment After Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Harassment, Discrimination, Standard of Proof, Admissibility of Evidence, Onus of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Damon Weller
Applicant
Michael Anthony Anderson
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Originating Application Human Rights/sex Discrimination / Judgment After Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was subjected to unlawful discrimination and sexual harassment under the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth)
- 2 Whether the applicant has discharged the onus of proof for his allegations
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to discharge the onus of proof for his allegations of sexual harassment and discrimination, as there was insufficient corroboration, no oral evidence or cross-examination, and no inherent implausibility or inconsistency established in the respondent's denial; thus, the claim could not be sustained.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- The application be dismissed.
- There be no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment