Siev v. Magid [2004] NSWCA 135
The reference to 'the trustee' in the contract was ambiguous and, on extrinsic evidence, referred to the Cyprus trustee (Totalserve). Mr. Siev failed to ensure effective transfer of his shareholdings and rights as required, constituting a fundamental breach justifying Mr. Magid's termination of the contract. There was a total failure of consideration for the payment made, entitling Mr. Magid to recover the US$750,000 paid.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['contract Interpretation' 'extrinsic Evidence' 'breach of Contract' 'termination' 'recovery of Money Paid' 'conditional Payment' 'failure of Consideration']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Identity of 'the trustee' referred to in the agreement" 'Whether breach of contract justifying termination occurred' 'Whether there was a total failure of consideration warranting recovery of money paid']
Ratio Decidendi
The reference to 'the trustee' in the contract was ambiguous and, on extrinsic evidence, referred to the Cyprus trustee (Totalserve). Mr. Siev failed to ensure effective transfer of his shareholdings and rights as required, constituting a fundamental breach justifying Mr. Magid's termination of the contract. There was a total failure of consideration for the payment made, entitling Mr. Magid to recover the US$750,000 paid.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed with costs' 'The orders made below, including return of US$750,000 plus interest to Mr. Magid, were affirmed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment