Bushell v R [2025] NSWCCA 23
It is an error to permit the jury to convict for manslaughter where the act causing death was the deceased's own self-injection of drugs and liability is premised on aiding and abetting that act. Section 18 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) is not engaged by self-killing, so a conviction for manslaughter on such a basis cannot stand. The directions given allowed for derivative liability arising from the deceased's own act, contrary to law. The conviction and sentence must be quashed and a new trial ordered.
- Parties
- Applicant: Daniel Bushell; Respondent: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- For the applicant, appeal upheld, conviction and sentence quashed, new trial ordered on count of manslaughter.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Against Conviction, Manslaughter, Murder, Joint Criminal Enterprise, Aiding and Abetting, Unlawful and Dangerous Act, Directions to Jury
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel Bushell
Applicant
Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred by permitting the jury to find the applicant guilty of manslaughter in circumstances of a self-killing
- 2 Whether the trial judge's directions to the jury were adequate regarding manslaughter with self-administered drugs
- 3 Whether the trial was procedurally unfair by introducing a new pathway of liability during deliberations
Ratio Decidendi
It is an error to permit the jury to convict for manslaughter where the act causing death was the deceased's own self-injection of drugs and liability is premised on aiding and abetting that act. Section 18 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) is not engaged by self-killing, so a conviction for manslaughter on such a basis cannot stand. The directions given allowed for derivative liability arising from the deceased's own act, contrary to law. The conviction and sentence must be quashed and a new trial ordered.
Court Disposition
For the applicant, appeal upheld, conviction and sentence quashed, new trial ordered on count of manslaughter.
Orders
- The Court grants leave to the appellant to add Ground 4 of the Grounds of Appeal in accordance with the document filed 25 February 2025.
- Grant leave to appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment