Daniel Clayton Scott v R [2011] NSWCCA 221
It was not established that sentencing practice had moved adversely to the applicant since the time of offence; the sentencing judge did not err by imposing sentence in accordance with contemporary standards. Additionally, it was within the discretion of the sentencing judge to make the sentences for the offences partly cumulative, given the presence of separate criminality.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence Granted; Appeal Dismissed
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'accessory Before the Fact' 'manslaughter' 'assault With Intent to Rob' 'sentencing Delay' 'sentencing Patterns']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence Granted; Appeal Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred in failing to sentence the applicant in accordance with sentencing patterns prevalent at the time of the offence' 'Whether the sentencing judge erred in failing to make the sentence in relation to assault with intent to rob wholly concurrent with the manslaughter count']
Ratio Decidendi
It was not established that sentencing practice had moved adversely to the applicant since the time of offence; the sentencing judge did not err by imposing sentence in accordance with contemporary standards. Additionally, it was within the discretion of the sentencing judge to make the sentences for the offences partly cumulative, given the presence of separate criminality.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal against sentence is granted to the applicant.' 'The appeal against sentence is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment