Lewin v R [2017] NSWCCA 65
No error by sentencing judge; cautious approach to psychological report was warranted due to applicant's inconsistent histories, lack of sworn evidence, and tentative causation. No undue reliance placed on previous sentence appeal; sentencing judge distinguished relevant features and undertook careful analysis.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 April 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Sentence Appeal / Determination of Application for Leave and Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentence Appeal' 'reckless Wounding Causing Grievous Bodily Harm' 'mental Condition in Sentencing' 'comparative Sentencing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Sentence Appeal / Determination of Application for Leave and Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether sentencing judge erred in approach to asserted mental condition of applicant' 'Whether sentencing judge placed undue weight on result of separate previous sentence appeal']
Ratio Decidendi
No error by sentencing judge; cautious approach to psychological report was warranted due to applicant's inconsistent histories, lack of sworn evidence, and tentative causation. No undue reliance placed on previous sentence appeal; sentencing judge distinguished relevant features and undertook careful analysis.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment