Khan, Daniel Rashid v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs & Anor [1997] FCA 717
The Tribunal did not fail to act according to substantial justice and the merits of the case by not recalling the applicant for further oral evidence on his conversion to Christianity, especially given the applicant's solicitor's indication that no further information would be submitted. The Tribunal was correct in finding that the applicant did not have a well-founded fear of persecution in Pakistan on account of his conversion to Christianity.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 August 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Status' 'well Founded Fear of Persecution' 'procedural Fairness' 'substantial Justice' 'merits Review']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Tribunal's failure to provide the applicant an oral hearing for his further claim breached s 420(2) of the Migration Act" 'Whether the Tribunal acted according to substantial justice and the merits as required by s 420(2)' 'Whether the applicant had a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of religion']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal did not fail to act according to substantial justice and the merits of the case by not recalling the applicant for further oral evidence on his conversion to Christianity, especially given the applicant's solicitor's indication that no further information would be submitted. The Tribunal was correct in finding that the applicant did not have a well-founded fear of persecution in Pakistan on account of his conversion to Christianity.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed.' "The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the proceeding, including reserved costs, if any."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment