Roberts v Goodwin Street Developments Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCA 103
The stay application was dismissed because Mr Roberts did not demonstrate any arguable grounds of appeal. The notice of appeal was manifestly hopeless, and the matters raised in his affidavit did not identify arguable error in the decision below. In any event, he provided no evidence of his financial means or material enabling the Court to frame a stay just to both parties, so the balance of convenience favoured Goodwin.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Stay Pending Appeal / Notice of Motion in the Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Notice of motion filed 1 June 2022 dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['stay Pending Appeal' 'arguable Grounds of Appeal' 'balance of Convenience' 'design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (nsw) Duty of Care']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Stay Pending Appeal / Notice of Motion in the Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Mr Roberts demonstrated arguable grounds of appeal sufficient to support a stay pending appeal.' 'Whether the balance of convenience or hardship justified a stay of enforcement of the judgment pending appeal.']
Ratio Decidendi
The stay application was dismissed because Mr Roberts did not demonstrate any arguable grounds of appeal. The notice of appeal was manifestly hopeless, and the matters raised in his affidavit did not identify arguable error in the decision below. In any event, he provided no evidence of his financial means or material enabling the Court to frame a stay just to both parties, so the balance of convenience favoured Goodwin.
Court Disposition
Notice of motion filed 1 June 2022 dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Notice of motion filed 1 June 2022 is dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment