Gordon v R [2009] NSWCCA 60
Leave to amend was refused because the matters relied on in support of the proposed unsafe or dangerous verdict ground were incapable, on the material before the Court, of demonstrating a miscarriage: the record showed no undue pressure on the jury, the jury had been told they could go home and return on Monday if they wished, and the alleged distress of a juror did not support the conclusion sought.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal Procedural Ruling / Application to Amend Grounds of Appeal to Add an Additional Ground
- Outcome
- Leave to amend ground refused
- Legal Topics
- ['application to Add Ground of Appeal' 'unsafe And/or Dangerous Verdict' 'jury Deliberations' 'miscarriage of Justice']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Procedural Ruling / Application to Amend Grounds of Appeal to Add an Additional Ground
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to amend the grounds of appeal to add a ground that the verdict was unsafe and/or dangerous in all the circumstances of the proceedings.' 'Whether alleged undue time pressure on the jury and an observation that a juror appeared distressed when returning the verdict could demonstrate a miscarriage.']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to amend was refused because the matters relied on in support of the proposed unsafe or dangerous verdict ground were incapable, on the material before the Court, of demonstrating a miscarriage: the record showed no undue pressure on the jury, the jury had been told they could go home and return on Monday if they wished, and the alleged distress of a juror did not support the conclusion sought.
Court Disposition
Leave to amend ground refused
Orders
- ['Leave is refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment