Daniel v Daniel [1906] HCA 74
An order awarding custody of a child in divorce does not affect 'status' within sec. 35(3)(a) of the Judiciary Act 1903; thus, appeal does not lie as of right. The Divorce Court's discretion regarding custody is broad and will not be interfered with on appeal unless exercised capriciously or on a wrong principle, which was not shown here.
- Parties
- Appellant: Daniel; Respondent: Daniel
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 1906
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Special Leave to Appeal (custody Order)
- Outcome
- special leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Custody of Child, Judicial Discretion, Appeals, Status Under Matrimonial Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel
Appellant
Daniel
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Special Leave to Appeal (custody Order)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an order giving custody of a child in divorce proceedings is a judgment affecting 'status' under sec. 35, sub-sec. (a)(3) of the Judiciary Act 1903, permitting appeal as of right
- 2 Criteria and principles governing the exercise of judicial discretion in custody orders on divorce
Ratio Decidendi
An order awarding custody of a child in divorce does not affect 'status' within sec. 35(3)(a) of the Judiciary Act 1903; thus, appeal does not lie as of right. The Divorce Court's discretion regarding custody is broad and will not be interfered with on appeal unless exercised capriciously or on a wrong principle, which was not shown here.
Court Disposition
special leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- special leave to appeal from Simpson J.'s decision refused
- appeal struck out
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment