REGINA v WILKIE, BURROUGHS & MAINPRIZE [2005] NSWCCA 311
The taking of evidence by video-link from a witness overseas does not contravene section 80 of the Constitution, as the trial is still held 'in the State' where the reception of evidence and the proceedings occur; the constitution is adaptable to technological methods of evidence presentation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Interlocutory Decision
- Outcome
- leave refused
- Legal Topics
- ['trial by Jury' 'video Link Testimony' 'venue of Trial' 'commonwealth Offences']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Interlocutory Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether a witness giving evidence by video-link from overseas violates the requirement in s80 of the Constitution that a trial on indictment for a Commonwealth offence be held 'in the State where the offence was committed'." 'Whether s5B of the Evidence (Audio and Audio Visual Links) Act 1998 (NSW) is constitutionally permissible when applied to Commonwealth criminal trials.']
Ratio Decidendi
The taking of evidence by video-link from a witness overseas does not contravene section 80 of the Constitution, as the trial is still held 'in the State' where the reception of evidence and the proceedings occur; the constitution is adaptable to technological methods of evidence presentation.
Court Disposition
leave refused
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal is refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment