R v Follett [2011] NSWDC 248

The total offending amounts to less than two grams over two months, with no prior convictions and three months already served in custody. The objective criminality does not require a gaol sentence and a bond to be of good behaviour, with supervision and conditions, is an adequate and suitable sentencing outcome.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 18 March 2011
Procedural Posture: Criminal / Sentence
Outcome: convicted; sentenced to bond to be of good behaviour for fifteen months with supervision and conditions
Legal Topics: ['sentence' 'ongoing Supply' 'methylamphetamine' 'bond']

['criminal Law'] ['sentence' 'ongoing Supply' 'methylamphetamine' 'bond']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentence

Legal Issues

1 ['What is the appropriate sentence for Danielle Louise Follett for ongoing supply of methylamphetamine?' 'Does the objective criminality and subjective circumstances warrant a non-custodial sentence?']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

convicted; sentenced to bond to be of good behaviour for fifteen months with supervision and conditions

Orders

['Convicted of two counts of ongoing supply of methylamphetamine.' 'Sentenced to enter into bond to be of good behaviour pursuant to s 9 of the Crime (Sentencing Procedure) Act for fifteen months for each offence.' 'Bond conditions: good behaviour; supply current address to Registry; attend call up for any breach;...