Murrie v Ku-ring-gai Council [2009] NSWLEC 1041
Having inspected the site, considered the proposal as depicted in the drawings and the agreed conditions, and noting that there were no matters in dispute between the parties, the Court made the consent orders in all three matters.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeals Concerning a Demolition Order, an Application for a Building Certificate, and Development Consent / Ex Tempore Judgment by Consent
- Outcome
- The appeals were upheld or upheld in part by consent; the demolition order was modified, a building certificate was granted, and development consent was granted subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['demolition Order' 'building Certificate' 'development Consent' 'retaining Wall' 'consent Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeals Concerning a Demolition Order, an Application for a Building Certificate, and Development Consent / Ex Tempore Judgment by Consent
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the demolition order should be modified in relation to the retaining wall at 3 Lightcliff Avenue, Lindfield.' 'Whether a building certificate should be granted for the identified works.' 'Whether development consent should be granted for demolition, reconstruction, building works and landscaping works.']
Ratio Decidendi
Having inspected the site, considered the proposal as depicted in the drawings and the agreed conditions, and noting that there were no matters in dispute between the parties, the Court made the consent orders in all three matters.
Court Disposition
The appeals were upheld or upheld in part by consent; the demolition order was modified, a building certificate was granted, and development consent was granted subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['In matter 10486 of 2008, the appeal is upheld in part.' 'The terms of order EPA0014/08 issued by Ku-ring-gai Council on 22 April 2008 are modified by the Court in accordance with section 121ZK(4)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.' 'The retaining wall is to be demolished in accordance with...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment