Murrie v Ku-ring-gai Council (No 2) [2009] NSWLEC 1348
The Court modified order 2(iii) because the requested extension was supported by consent orders, arose from unforeseen practical delays, neighbours had been notified and expressed no concerns, and there was no dispute requiring determination.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Modification Application Concerning a Demolition Order / Ex Tempore Judgment on Consent Orders
- Outcome
- Order 2(iii) in proceedings No 10486 of 2008 modified by consent.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification of Demolition Order' 'retaining Wall' 'extension of Time' 'certificate of Structural Adequacy']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Modification Application Concerning a Demolition Order / Ex Tempore Judgment on Consent Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether order 2(iii) in proceedings No 10486 of 2008 should be modified to extend the time for completion of works and provision of a certificate of structural adequacy to 3 December 2009.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court modified order 2(iii) because the requested extension was supported by consent orders, arose from unforeseen practical delays, neighbours had been notified and expressed no concerns, and there was no dispute requiring determination.
Court Disposition
Order 2(iii) in proceedings No 10486 of 2008 modified by consent.
Orders
- ['Order 2 (iii) in proceedings No 10486 of 2008 is modified as follows: "All works referred to above are to be completed and a certificate of structural adequacy is to be provided to Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council on or before 3 December 2009."']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment