Darkinjung Local Aboriginal Land Council v Attorney General of New South Wales [2022] FCA 1555
The applicant, as registered proprietor of each lot, had standing and the procedural requirements of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) were satisfied. The evidence established that each lot had been subject to Scheduled interests, including special leases or suburban holdings, which were previous exclusive possession acts attributable to New South Wales. By operation of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) and s 20 of the Native Title (New South Wales) Act 1994 (NSW), those acts permanently extinguished any native title in the Land. The unopposed application was therefore within power and appropriate to determine on the papers.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Non Claimant Native Title Determination Application Under Ss 13(1)(a) and 61(1) of the Native Title Act 1993 (cth) / Unopposed Application Determined on the Papers
- Outcome
- Application granted; determination made that native title does not exist in relation to the Land; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['non Claimant Application' 'negative Determination of Native Title' 'previous Exclusive Possession Acts' 'scheduled Interests' 'extinguishment of Native Title' 'suburban Holdings' 'special Leases']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Non Claimant Native Title Determination Application Under Ss 13(1)(a) and 61(1) of the Native Title Act 1993 (cth) / Unopposed Application Determined on the Papers
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant had standing to bring a non-claimant application for a determination that native title does not exist over the Land.' 'Whether the formal notification and jurisdictional requirements under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) were satisfied.' 'Whether native title in each lot had been extinguished by previous exclusive possession acts involving Scheduled interests.' 'Whether it was appropriate to make a negative determination of native title on the papers under s 86G of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant, as registered proprietor of each lot, had standing and the procedural requirements of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) were satisfied. The evidence established that each lot had been subject to Scheduled interests, including special leases or suburban holdings, which were previous exclusive possession acts attributable to New South Wales. By operation of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) and s 20 of the Native Title (New South Wales) Act 1994 (NSW), those acts permanently extinguished any native title in the Land. The unopposed application was therefore within power and appropriate to determine on the papers.
Court Disposition
Application granted; determination made that native title does not exist in relation to the Land; no order as to costs.
Orders
- ['Native title does not exist in relation to the areas of land and waters in the Parish of Wallarah, County of Northumberland, in the State of New South Wales comprised in and known as Lot 7340 in Deposited Plan 1166918, Lot 472 in Deposited Plan 755266, Lot 471 in Deposited Plan 755266, Lot 7305 in Deposited Plan...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment