Irving v D’Michelle t/as Westside Customs and Mechanical [2015] NSWCATCD 152
The respondent failed to perform the engine reconditioning with due care and skill by not re-boring the cylinders and installing oversize pistons and rings, which was causally linked to the loss of compression and need for further engine repair. The applicant is entitled to damages reflecting the cost of rectifying...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Consumer Claim / Hearing and Determination
- Outcome
- Applicant succeeds; damages awarded.
- Legal Topics
- ['due Care and Skill' 'consumer Guarantee' 'causation' 'damages']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Consumer Claim / Hearing and Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the respondent failed to exercise due care and skill in reconditioning the applicant's vehicle engine" "Whether the respondent's work caused the loss of compression and ongoing issues in the applicant's vehicle engine" 'What is the appropriate measure of damages for breach of the consumer guarantee']
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent failed to perform the engine reconditioning with due care and skill by not re-boring the cylinders and installing oversize pistons and rings, which was causally linked to the loss of compression and need for further engine repair. The applicant is entitled to damages reflecting the cost of rectifying the defective work, assessed as $7,000.00.
Court Disposition
Applicant succeeds; damages awarded.
Orders
- ['The respondent is to pay the applicant $7,000.00 on or before 21 days from the date of this decision.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment