Ross-Sampson and Anor v Crawley [2003] NSWCA 335
The available evidence was insufficient to establish, on the balance of probabilities, any breach of the duty of care by the first appellant. The trial judge failed to properly evaluate the competing expert and factual evidence. Judgment for the plaintiff/respondent was set aside, and judgment was entered for the defendants.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision After Appeal From District Court, on Liability in Personal Injury Action
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgment for the plaintiff set aside; judgment entered for the defendants
- Legal Topics
- ['negligence' 'duty of Care' 'motor Vehicle Accident' 'credibility of Witnesses' 'expert Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision After Appeal From District Court, on Liability in Personal Injury Action
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the evidence established breach of duty of care by the first appellant' 'Whether the trial judge erred in the evaluation of the credibility of witnesses and expert evidence' "Whether there was sufficient evidence to support the finding that the first appellant's vehicle struck the respondent's motorcycle causing the accident"]
Ratio Decidendi
The available evidence was insufficient to establish, on the balance of probabilities, any breach of the duty of care by the first appellant. The trial judge failed to properly evaluate the competing expert and factual evidence. Judgment for the plaintiff/respondent was set aside, and judgment was entered for the defendants.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgment for the plaintiff set aside; judgment entered for the defendants
Orders
- ['Judgment in favour of the plaintiff set aside' 'Judgment entered for the defendants' "The respondent is to pay the appellants' costs of the proceedings and the appeal" 'The respondent to have a certificate under the Suitors Fund Act']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment