Darren O'Brien v Robert Francis Little and ors; Stephen James Walsh v Robert Francis Little and ors [2007] NSWSC 282
Leave to interrogate was granted for some interrogatories, specifically 3 and parts of 10, as they may be probative of foreseeability and relevant issues; others were disallowed for being oppressive, imprecise, irrelevant, or seeking information not objectively relevant.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Darren Andrew O'Brien; Plaintiff: Stephen James Walsh; Defendants: Robert Francis Little and ors
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Damages Application / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Serve Further Amended Interrogatories
- Outcome
- Application for leave to serve Further Amended Interrogatories partially granted; costs awarded against Plaintiffs.
- Legal Topics
- Interrogatories, Personal Injury, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Darren Andrew O'Brien
Plaintiff
Stephen James Walsh
Plaintiff
Robert Francis Little and ors
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Damages Application / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Serve Further Amended Interrogatories
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Plaintiffs should be granted leave to serve Further Amended Interrogatories on the Bega Valley Shire Council
- 2 Whether certain interrogatories are objectionable or oppressive under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules Part 22
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to interrogate was granted for some interrogatories, specifically 3 and parts of 10, as they may be probative of foreseeability and relevant issues; others were disallowed for being oppressive, imprecise, irrelevant, or seeking information not objectively relevant.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to serve Further Amended Interrogatories partially granted; costs awarded against Plaintiffs.
Orders
- Bega Valley Shire Council within 21 days to provide verified answers to Amended Interrogatories 3 and 10 to extent indicated in judgment.
- Plaintiff to pay 80% of Council's costs of proceedings culminating in judgment delivered on 14 February 2007.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment