Birtles v Sdrolias [2022] NSWCATCD 129

Birtles v Sdrolias [2022] NSWCATCD 129

None of the reasons advanced by the respondents, either individually or cumulatively, warrant an order permitting transmission or distribution of the sound recordings under the Court Security Act 2005 (NSW); the statutory prohibition stands.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 November 2022
Procedural Posture
Application for Miscellaneous Relief / Decision on Papers
Outcome
Application for miscellaneous relief dismissed
Legal Topics
['distribution or Transmission of Tribunal Sound Recordings' 'open Justice' 'court Security Act 2005 (nsw) Applications']
['practice and Procedure'] ['distribution or Transmission of Tribunal Sound Recordings' 'open Justice' 'court Security Act 2005 (nsw) Applications']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Miscellaneous Relief / Decision on Papers

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the respondents should have permission to distribute or transmit sound recordings of Tribunal proceedings under the Court Security Act 2005 (NSW)']

Ratio Decidendi

None of the reasons advanced by the respondents, either individually or cumulatively, warrant an order permitting transmission or distribution of the sound recordings under the Court Security Act 2005 (NSW); the statutory prohibition stands.

Court Disposition

Application for miscellaneous relief dismissed

Orders

  • ['A hearing is dispensed with.' 'The application for miscellaneous relief is dismissed.']