Gardner v Secretary of the Treasury (Department of Justice - Corrective Services NSW) [2014] NSWIRComm 52
The applicant's employment ended due to the expiry of a fixed term contract and a lack of available ongoing positions caused by restructuring and not because of injury. Expiry of a fixed term contract does not constitute a dismissal under s 241 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987, so the jurisdiction for reinstatement under Pt 8 of the Act was not enlivened.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 October 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Reinstatement Under S 242 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 / Commission Decision
- Outcome
- Application for reinstatement refused
- Legal Topics
- ['reinstatement' 'workers Compensation' 'fixed Term Employment' 'dismissal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Reinstatement Under S 242 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 / Commission Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant was dismissed because he was not fit for employment as a result of injury' "Whether termination of a fixed term contract constitutes a 'dismissal' under s 241 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987"]
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's employment ended due to the expiry of a fixed term contract and a lack of available ongoing positions caused by restructuring and not because of injury. Expiry of a fixed term contract does not constitute a dismissal under s 241 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987, so the jurisdiction for reinstatement under Pt 8 of the Act was not enlivened.
Court Disposition
Application for reinstatement refused
Orders
- ['The application by Darren Gardner for reinstatement under s 242 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 is refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment