Linney v R [2013] NSWCCA 251
The sentence was not manifestly excessive, the sentencing judge did not err in treating emotional harm as an aggravating factor on the available evidence, proper weight was given to mitigating features, and it was open to the judge to decline to find good prospects of rehabilitation or likeliness not to re-offend....
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal against sentence dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentence Appeal' 'threatening Judicial Officer' 'aggravating Factors' 'assessment of Seriousness' 'mitigating Circumstances']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether sentence imposed was manifestly excessive' 'Whether sentencing judge erred in treating emotional harm as an aggravating factor without sufficient evidence it was substantial' 'Whether sufficient weight was given to mitigating circumstances' 'Whether applicant had good prospects of rehabilitation and was unlikely to re-offend']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence was not manifestly excessive, the sentencing judge did not err in treating emotional harm as an aggravating factor on the available evidence, proper weight was given to mitigating features, and it was open to the judge to decline to find good prospects of rehabilitation or likeliness not to re-offend. Accordingly, leave to appeal is granted but the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal against sentence dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal against sentence granted.' 'Appeal against sentence dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment