Musgrove v R [2007] NSWCCA 21

Musgrove v R [2007] NSWCCA 21

The sentencing judge was entitled to decline to find special circumstances, correctly structured the sentence under s44 by setting a non-parole period of 8 years (out of 10.5 years) and a parole period less than one third, and the sentence imposed was not so manifestly excessive as to be outside the range available.

Parties
Applicant: Darren Musgrove; Respondent: Crown
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 February 2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Severity of Sentence; Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Standard Non Parole Period, Aggravated Sexual Assault, Special Circumstances, Parole Structure, Manifest Excess

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Darren Musgrove

Applicant

Crown

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Severity of Sentence; Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether sentencing judge erred in failing to find special circumstances for varying the parole period
  2. 2 Whether sentencing judge erred in failing to impose a parole period in statutory proportion to the head sentence under s44 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
  3. 3 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge was entitled to decline to find special circumstances, correctly structured the sentence under s44 by setting a non-parole period of 8 years (out of 10.5 years) and a parole period less than one third, and the sentence imposed was not so manifestly excessive as to be outside the range available.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Leave to appeal against sentence granted
  • Appeal dismissed