Carrette v Superannuation Complaints Tribunal [2017] FCA 640
The Tribunal's decision was affected by legal error because it failed to engage with essential medical material critical to the decision, namely Professor McFarlane's 2013 opinions that the applicant's current disabling psychiatric condition was complex PTSD or a separate condition independent of the earlier PTSD and MDD. The Tribunal appeared to reject or dismiss that evidence by a mechanical application of DSM-IV criteria, although Professor McFarlane accepted that complex PTSD was not included in the DSM system. Because that central material was necessary to deciding whether the applicant's total and permanent disablement was related to a pre-existing medical condition within cl...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal on a Question of Law Under S 46 of the Superannuation (resolution of Complaints) Act 1993 (cth) From a Decision of the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal / Final Hearing and Judgment on the Appeal From the Tribunal's Decision Dated 20 September 2016
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; decision of the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal set aside; matter remitted to the Tribunal for re-hearing; second respondent ordered to pay the applicant's costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['total and Permanent Disablement Benefit' 'pre Existing Medical Conditions Exclusion' 'superannuation Complaints Tribunal Review' 'failure to Engage With Critical Medical Evidence' 'fair and Reasonable Trustee Decision']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal on a Question of Law Under S 46 of the Superannuation (resolution of Complaints) Act 1993 (cth) From a Decision of the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal / Final Hearing and Judgment on the Appeal From the Tribunal's Decision Dated 20 September 2016
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Tribunal erred in affirming the trustee's rejection of the applicant's total and permanent disablement benefit claim under cl 6.2(b)(ii) of the insurance policy." "Whether the Tribunal failed to engage with critical medical evidence from Professor McFarlane that the applicant's later psychiatric condition was a separate condition, complex PTSD, unrelated to earlier PTSD and MDD." "Whether the Tribunal's reasoning impermissibly or inadequately disposed of Professor McFarlane's views by reference to DSM-IV or DSM-IV-TR criteria."]
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's decision was affected by legal error because it failed to engage with essential medical material critical to the decision, namely Professor McFarlane's 2013 opinions that the applicant's current disabling psychiatric condition was complex PTSD or a separate condition independent of the earlier PTSD and MDD. The Tribunal appeared to reject or dismiss that evidence by a mechanical application of DSM-IV criteria, although Professor McFarlane accepted that complex PTSD was not included in the DSM system. Because that central material was necessary to deciding whether the applicant's total and permanent disablement was related to a pre-existing medical condition within cl...
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; decision of the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal set aside; matter remitted to the Tribunal for re-hearing; second respondent ordered to pay the applicant's costs.
Orders
- ['The decision of the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal dated 20 September 2016 be set aside.' 'The matter be remitted to the Tribunal for re-hearing.' 'The second respondent pay the costs of the applicant.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment