Darryll Cullen v ZLB Behring LLC [2006] NSWSC 359

Darryll Cullen v ZLB Behring LLC [2006] NSWSC 359

The defendant succeeded in resisting the plaintiff's substantial claims, including an application for a permanent injunction, justifying a costs order in the defendant's favour. However, due to the time and costs incurred on factual matters the defendant failed upon, and considering the overall circumstances leading to litigation, it is appropriate for the plaintiff to pay only 75% of the defendant's costs on a party-party basis, rather than indemnity costs.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 April 2006
Procedural Posture
Commercial Proceeding (equity Division) / Post Judgment (determination of Costs)
Outcome
Plaintiff ordered to pay 75% of the defendant's costs on a party-party basis; no indemnity costs ordered.
Legal Topics
['costs' 'judicial Discretion in Costs Orders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Commercial Proceeding (equity Division) / Post Judgment (determination of Costs)

  1. 1 ["Whether the plaintiff should pay the defendant's costs and the appropriate proportion" 'Whether any part of the costs should be awarded on an indemnity basis' 'Appropriate consideration and application of exceptions to the usual order as to costs']

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant succeeded in resisting the plaintiff's substantial claims, including an application for a permanent injunction, justifying a costs order in the defendant's favour. However, due to the time and costs incurred on factual matters the defendant failed upon, and considering the overall circumstances leading to litigation, it is appropriate for the plaintiff to pay only 75% of the defendant's costs on a party-party basis, rather than indemnity costs.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff ordered to pay 75% of the defendant's costs on a party-party basis; no indemnity costs ordered.

Orders

  • ["Plaintiff to pay 75% of defendant's costs on a party-party basis." 'Court adopts orders as to costs reflected in paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the short minutes of order initialed and dated 28 April 2006.']