Darryll Cullen v ZLB Behring LLC [2006] NSWSC 359
The defendant succeeded in resisting the plaintiff's substantial claims, including an application for a permanent injunction, justifying a costs order in the defendant's favour. However, due to the time and costs incurred on factual matters the defendant failed upon, and considering the overall circumstances leading to litigation, it is appropriate for the plaintiff to pay only 75% of the defendant's costs on a party-party basis, rather than indemnity costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Proceeding (equity Division) / Post Judgment (determination of Costs)
- Outcome
- Plaintiff ordered to pay 75% of the defendant's costs on a party-party basis; no indemnity costs ordered.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'judicial Discretion in Costs Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Commercial Proceeding (equity Division) / Post Judgment (determination of Costs)
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the plaintiff should pay the defendant's costs and the appropriate proportion" 'Whether any part of the costs should be awarded on an indemnity basis' 'Appropriate consideration and application of exceptions to the usual order as to costs']
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant succeeded in resisting the plaintiff's substantial claims, including an application for a permanent injunction, justifying a costs order in the defendant's favour. However, due to the time and costs incurred on factual matters the defendant failed upon, and considering the overall circumstances leading to litigation, it is appropriate for the plaintiff to pay only 75% of the defendant's costs on a party-party basis, rather than indemnity costs.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff ordered to pay 75% of the defendant's costs on a party-party basis; no indemnity costs ordered.
Orders
- ["Plaintiff to pay 75% of defendant's costs on a party-party basis." 'Court adopts orders as to costs reflected in paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the short minutes of order initialed and dated 28 April 2006.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment