Dartanyon Developments Pty Ltd v Kiama Municipal Council [2020] NSWLEC 1125
The appeal is upheld and development consent granted as the amended plans and written request under clause 4.6 satisfied the Court that the exceedance of the height standard is justified, consistent with the planning objectives and public interest.
- Parties
- Applicant: Dartanyon Developments Pty Ltd; Applicant: The Rogan Property Group Pty Ltd; Respondent: Kiama Municipal Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference and Consent Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions; costs orders made.
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Variation of Development Standards, Height of Buildings, Environmental Planning Grounds
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dartanyon Developments Pty Ltd
Applicant
The Rogan Property Group Pty Ltd
Applicant
Kiama Municipal Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference and Consent Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether consent should be granted for proposed shop top housing development
- 2 Whether variation to height standards under clause 4.6 of Kiama Local Environmental Plan 2011 is justified
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is upheld and development consent granted as the amended plans and written request under clause 4.6 satisfied the Court that the exceedance of the height standard is justified, consistent with the planning objectives and public interest.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions; costs orders made.
Orders
- Applicant granted leave to rely on amended plans and documents and written request under clause 4.6 of Kiama Local Environmental Plan 2011 dated 5 March 2020.
- Applicant to pay Respondent's costs thrown away for reviewing amended plans and variation requests and for attendance at the hearing, under s 8.15(3) of Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment