In the matter of Investwell Pty Limited (In Liquidation) [2012] NSWSC 1056
The applicant is presently entitled to judgment against the first and second respondents for the sum corresponding to the judgment entered against him, by reason of his right of indemnity.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 September 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations List Proceeding / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for applicant against first and second respondents
- Legal Topics
- ['indemnity' 'money Judgment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Corporations List Proceeding / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant is entitled to indemnity from the first and second respondents for amounts payable under prior judgment.']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant is presently entitled to judgment against the first and second respondents for the sum corresponding to the judgment entered against him, by reason of his right of indemnity.
Court Disposition
Judgment for applicant against first and second respondents
Orders
- ['Judgment for the applicant Darryl Leon Roberts against the first respondent James Patrick Normoyle and the second respondent Anne Maree Huxley for $205,383.00.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment