DASKOLAS V. CAMPBELL

DASKOLAS V. CAMPBELL

The primary judge was under a misconception as to the critical facts, particularly regarding the evidence about the traffic lights and the sequence of events leading to the collision. This error justified the order for a new trial by the Court of Appeal. The appeal is dismissed, and the order for a new trial stands.

Parties
Appellant: Daskolas; Respondent: Campbell
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 December 1974
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment After Appeal From Intermediate Court (court of Appeal of New South Wales)
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Motor Vehicle Accidents
Tort Law Negligence Contributory Negligence Motor Vehicle Accidents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daskolas

Appellant

Campbell

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment After Appeal From Intermediate Court (court of Appeal of New South Wales)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the collision was due to negligence on the part of the appellant (Daskolas)
  2. 2 Whether the respondent (Campbell) was guilty of contributory negligence
  3. 3 Whether the trial judge was under a misconception of the facts warranting a new trial

Ratio Decidendi

The primary judge was under a misconception as to the critical facts, particularly regarding the evidence about the traffic lights and the sequence of events leading to the collision. This error justified the order for a new trial by the Court of Appeal. The appeal is dismissed, and the order for a new trial stands.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs.
  • Order of new trial by the Court of Appeal stands.