Davaria Pty Limited v 7-Eleven Stores Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 760
Bulletin No. 12 was a confidential communication made for the dominant purpose of providing legal advice to joint clients of Levitt Robinson; privilege attaches under s 118 of the Evidence Act and is jointly held. Privilege was not waived by unilateral disclosure to a WhatsApp group or by subsequent correspondence with 7-Eleven; all holders must concur in waiver for privilege to be lost.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application in Class Actions / Determination of Privilege and Waiver
- Outcome
- Applications granted. Legal professional privilege attaches; orders made restraining use and dissemination of Bulletin No. 12 and associated documents by the First Respondent; First Respondent to pay Applicants' costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['legal Professional Privilege' 'waiver of Privilege' 'confidential Communications' 'joint Privilege' 'dominant Purpose' 'disclosure in Class Actions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application in Class Actions / Determination of Privilege and Waiver
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Bulletin No. 12 is a confidential communication or document for the dominant purpose of providing legal advice' 'Whether legal professional privilege attaches to Bulletin No. 12 under s 118 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth)' 'Whether privilege was waived by dissemination to a WhatsApp messaging group or through correspondence']
Ratio Decidendi
Bulletin No. 12 was a confidential communication made for the dominant purpose of providing legal advice to joint clients of Levitt Robinson; privilege attaches under s 118 of the Evidence Act and is jointly held. Privilege was not waived by unilateral disclosure to a WhatsApp group or by subsequent correspondence with 7-Eleven; all holders must concur in waiver for privilege to be lost.
Court Disposition
Applications granted. Legal professional privilege attaches; orders made restraining use and dissemination of Bulletin No. 12 and associated documents by the First Respondent; First Respondent to pay Applicants' costs.
Orders
- ['The First Respondent not seek to tender a copy of NDJ-38 in any hearing before the Court or disclose the contents of NDJ-38, in submissions or otherwise.' 'Annexure NDJ-38, NDJ-39, NDJ-40 and NDJ-41 to the affidavit of Nigel David Jones sworn 7 May 2018 be removed from the Court file, and the First Respondent not...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment