Grace v Grace (No 5) [2013] NSWSC 601
Given there are no proceedings for winding up on foot, the purposes for appointment of the provisional liquidator have been achieved, and the companies are manifestly solvent, the appointment of the provisional liquidator should be terminated; statutory right to inspection under s 531 applies and records must be produced.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Applications / Orders and Directions Following Interlocutory Applications
- Outcome
- Orders made for inspection, termination of provisional liquidator, costs, and directions.
- Legal Topics
- ['external Administration' 'provisional Liquidator' 'inspection of Books' 'termination of Provisional Liquidator' 'judicial Advice']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Applications / Orders and Directions Following Interlocutory Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the provisional liquidator must produce books and records for inspection under s 531 Corporations Act' 'Whether the appointment of the provisional liquidator should be terminated' 'Whether the provisional liquidator is justified in entering into loan transactions and giving security over assets to pay fees']
Ratio Decidendi
Given there are no proceedings for winding up on foot, the purposes for appointment of the provisional liquidator have been achieved, and the companies are manifestly solvent, the appointment of the provisional liquidator should be terminated; statutory right to inspection under s 531 applies and records must be produced.
Court Disposition
Orders made for inspection, termination of provisional liquidator, costs, and directions.
Orders
- ['On 1 May 2013, provisional liquidator to produce for inspection all books kept in respect of Nevilda Holdings Pty Ltd and Nevilda Investments Pty Ltd under Corporations Act s 531 (including Reg 5.6.01).' "Provisional liquidator to pay first and second defendants' costs of interlocutory process filed 15 April 2013...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment