Leiper v R [2018] NSWCCA 117

Leiper v R [2018] NSWCCA 117

The applicant did not demonstrate that a conditional stay was necessary to prevent unfairness; the case for a stay was weak given that all materials had been disclosed, the logs provided significant guidance, and the applicant had opportunity to review the recordings. The likely result of allowing the appeal—a further adjournment of an already much-delayed trial—outweighed any weak prospects of substantive relief. Leave to appeal was therefore refused.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 June 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Interlocutory Order
Outcome
Leave to appeal is refused
Legal Topics
['stay of Proceedings' 'disclosure' 'fair Trial' 'legal Aid Funding']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Interlocutory Order

  1. 1 ['Whether a conditional stay of proceedings should be granted pending provision of transcripts of covert audio recordings by the Crown' 'Whether failure to provide such transcripts results in unfairness to the accused warranting a stay' "Whether leave should be granted to appeal the District Court's refusal to stay the proceedings"]

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant did not demonstrate that a conditional stay was necessary to prevent unfairness; the case for a stay was weak given that all materials had been disclosed, the logs provided significant guidance, and the applicant had opportunity to review the recordings. The likely result of allowing the appeal—a further adjournment of an already much-delayed trial—outweighed any weak prospects of substantive relief. Leave to appeal was therefore refused.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal is refused

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal from the interlocutory order refusing a stay is refused.']