Brealey v Shields [2009] NSWSC 1148
Where there are only two contributories, each with equal entitlement, the requirement to annex a schedule under regulation 5.6.71(1) may be dispensed with, allowing the liquidator to distribute surplus without specifying quantified amounts per share.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Winding Up of Company / Application for Special Leave to Distribute Surplus
- Outcome
- Distribution of surplus ordered; requirement for schedule dispensed; liquidator allowed to recoup expenses.
- Legal Topics
- ['winding Up by the Court' 'distribution of Surplus' "liquidator's Powers"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Winding Up of Company / Application for Special Leave to Distribute Surplus
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the liquidator requires a schedule of quantified entitlements annexed to the order authorising the distribution of surplus' 'Whether the court can dispense with the schedule requirement under regulation 5.6.71(1) in a simple case with two contributories']
Ratio Decidendi
Where there are only two contributories, each with equal entitlement, the requirement to annex a schedule under regulation 5.6.71(1) may be dispensed with, allowing the liquidator to distribute surplus without specifying quantified amounts per share.
Court Disposition
Distribution of surplus ordered; requirement for schedule dispensed; liquidator allowed to recoup expenses.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to regulation 5.6.71(1), the order authorising distribution of surplus need not annex a schedule in accordance with Form 551.' 'Liquidator has special leave under section 488(2) to distribute the surplus in equal shares to David Anthony Brealey and Edward John Shiels.' 'Liquidator may recoup costs and...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment